TOKYO: Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) could lose its majority in Sunday’s general election, polls show, potentially turning new leader Fumio Kishida into another short-term prime minister and triggering a return to political uncertainty.
The LDP, which has ruled Japan for most of the post-war era, will likely stay in power thanks to its coalition with junior partner Komeito, although it is almost certain to lose seats in parliament’s powerful lower house.
A former banker who has failed to invigorate voters with calls for a more equitable “new capitalism”, Kishida has set a coalition target for a majority 233 seats in the 465-seat lower chamber, well below the 276 seats held by the LDP alone before the election was called.
The focus remains on whether the LDP can hang onto a majority by itself. A lacklustre result for Kishida, who is just weeks into the job, could lead to a push in the party to oust him ahead of next year’s upper house vote.
That could also bring policy uncertainty.
“A weak showing for the LDP could also give more say for the dovish Komeito, acting as a break on the conservative security policies popular with the LDP’s right wing,” said Tomoaki Iwai, political science professor at Nihon University.
A poll by the Yomiuri daily predicted the LDP would come close to majority but may fall short. Another recent poll by the Asahi daily predicted the party would lose seats but come in well above 233.
In a rare move, opposition parties have been successful in coordinating candidates in a large number of districts.
“The opposition collaboration in single seat districts is remarkable. It means that the votes that would previously be split among several candidates are now going to one, giving the opposition a realistic chance against the LDP,” said Iwai.
Turnout is key
Sunday’s election is the most unpredictable since the LDP swept back to power under Shinzo Abe in 2012 ― a victory that ushered in the longest premiership in Japan’s history and ended years of policy paralysis caused by revolving-door premiers.
Voters are frustrated with the ruling bloc after 20 months of pandemic-induced restrictions and a sluggish economy. After Abe stepped down in ill health last year, he was succeeded by Yoshihide Suga who resigned in September due to widespread disapproval of his handling of the pandemic.
The party may have also hurt itself by choosing Kishida to succeed Suga, rather than popular maverick Taro Kono from its liberal wing.
Unfortunately for the opposition, they too have failed to get traction. Yukio Edano, the leader of the largest opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, fares even below Kishida suitability ratings.
With about 40 per cent of the electorate still undecided and one of the lowest turnouts in the post-war era expected, the outcome is far from certain.
The LDP resoundingly lost in a special upper house election on Sunday in Shizuoka, southwest of Tokyo, despite two visits by Kishida to woo voters there.
Kishida has struggled to explain how his economic programme ― aimed at reducing the wealth gap ― differs from the “Abenomics” remedy of Abe and Suga of using massive monetary and fiscal stimulus to revive the moribund economy.
He has taken on many of Abe’s conservative security policies, calling for doubling of defence spending with an eye on China.
Kishida made party heavyweight Akira Amari the LDP’s powerful Secretary General. Amari has pushed to restart Japan’s nuclear power plants – a policy opposed by 40% of the people.
Key battlegrounds include the third-largest city of Osaka, the manufacturing hub of Nagoya and the capital, Tokyo, where several current and former LDP ministers are vulnerable to opposition challenge.
“With the coalition enjoying all the structural advantages in the election, in the end it all hinges on the turnout,” said Koichi Nakano, a political science professor at Sophia University, noting that higher turnout favours the opposition.
Polls suggest turnout will be slightly higher than the post-war record low of 52.66 per cent in 2014.
“If the turnout goes a level higher and into the sixties, opposition parties may come ahead in many, many single member districts,” said Nakano.
